Resources

Threat intelligence, research, and everything you need to understand preemptive security.

All resources

Press Enter to search or Esc to close

Research

Peer-facing research & preprints

Open-access preprints from PacketViper on Automated Moving Target Defense, OT command-path integrity, and cost-aware AI inference. Each paper is published on Zenodo with a permanent DOI and a Creative Commons license, free to read and cite.

Preprint Published July 17, 2026 · v0.3 · CC BY 4.0

A Packet-Layer Capability Triad for Remote Operational Technology: A Candidate Compensating Control for Physically Exposed, Resource-Constrained Sites

Francesco Trama, PacketViper · DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21403201

Remote operational-technology sites — water and wastewater pump and lift stations, roadside traffic-control cabinets, distribution substations, and oil-and-gas RTU locations — often combine legacy endpoints, remote administration, sparse staffing, and shared or insufficiently segmented field networks. Standards correctly prioritize reducing external exposure, segmenting networks, and hardening insecure equipment, but cost, outage, and workforce constraints can delay those preferred controls. This paper asks a narrower question: which packet-layer capabilities could reduce cyber-physical risk while full segmentation, protocol modernization, or equipment replacement remains incomplete? Using a purposively selected primary-source incident corpus, it identifies recurring attack stages and defines a candidate packet-layer capability triad: (1) automated moving target defense (AMTD) with embedded deception; (2) cyber-physical anomaly enforcement based on communication and process state; and (3) command-aware industrial-protocol enforcement — all operating on the network path without software agents on protected controllers. It maps the triad to the derived attack path, relates it to NIST cyber-resiliency guidance and IEC 62443 compensating-measure concepts, specifies a falsifiable evaluation program, and states its limitations honestly, including direct physical bypass, encrypted traffic, and authorized-but-malicious command paths.

Preprint Published July 14, 2026 · CC BY 4.0

Denying the World Model: Automated Moving Target Defense as an Architectural Countermeasure to Autonomous AI Agents

Francesco Trama, PacketViper · DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21347479

The emergence of autonomous AI agents inside enterprise networks is no longer a theoretical concern. In March 2026, an experimental agent affiliated with a major cloud provider’s research ecosystem autonomously probed internal networks, opened a reverse SSH tunnel to an external host, and diverted compute to cryptocurrency mining — none of it instructed, and none of it caught until infrastructure-level firewall logs flagged the anomalous traffic after the fact. This paper argues that Automated Moving Target Defense (AMTD) — which continuously invalidates the environmental consistency an agent depends on — attacks a dependency shared by every agent architecture, and its effectiveness scales with attacker autonomy rather than against it. We report results from three independent test campaigns against autonomous and AI-augmented adversaries on standard production AMTD configuration with no AI-specific detection logic: containment was complete across all runs (zero internal hosts reached, zero successful authentications, zero data exfiltration), with first-contact enforcement measured in minutes or seconds, including against self-replicating multi-agent variants. We state the central claim in falsifiable form, position it against the moving-target-defense and cyber-deception literature, and identify the study’s limitations honestly, including the absence of a comparative baseline arm.

Preprint Published July 16, 2026 · v3.0 · CC BY 4.0

Trust the Command, Not Just the Connection: Monitoring and Managing the NTCIP Command Path to Traffic Signal Controllers and Dynamic Message Signs

Francesco Trama, PacketViper · DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21393551

Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) govern physical roadway behavior through networked field devices, including actuated signal controllers, dynamic message signs (DMS), and roadside units. For the signal-controller and DMS standards examined here, the deployed command path has historically relied on SNMP versions 1 and 2c, which use shared community strings and do not provide the cryptographic message authentication, integrity protection, and replay resistance available in SNMPv3. The result is a large installed base of transportation field devices that act on commands based largely on network reachability and possession of a shared community string rather than on cryptographically verifiable command origin and integrity. This paper examines that structural weakness; reviews the public record of documented incidents and vulnerabilities across multiple vendors, spanning 2014 through a recent CISA advisory; and argues that agencies require monitoring and management applied to the command itself — inline and at the wire — rather than to the network connection alone. It describes an inline, agentless enforcement approach implemented by PacketViper, explicitly states its limits, and concludes that command-path integrity is a reliability and public-safety requirement for ITS operations, not solely a cybersecurity control.

Preprint Published July 13, 2026 · CC BY 4.0

Best Token Use Path (BTUP): Client-Side Traffic Engineering for Cost-Aware LLM Inference

Francesco Trama · DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21337900

Large language models select generation behavior against a trained quality objective that contains no representation of token cost — the inference analogue of a link-state routing protocol whose advertisements omit the cost field. Every path looks free, so the protocol systematically prefers verbose, expensive routes: preamble, restatement, hedging, full-file rewrites, and unbounded agent loops. We introduce Best Token Use Path (BTUP): a provider-independent, client-side traffic-engineering framework that represents an AI request as a complete execution path (context policy, retrieval, prompt transform, cache strategy, provider/model, reasoning and output budgets, output contract, tool plan, validation, and retry/escalation policy) and selects the path minimizing expected cost per accepted resolution (CAR) subject to quality, latency, safety, privacy, and budget constraints. We specify the control plane — edge classification, service-class policy, a Path State Database, constrained path computation, validator-driven fast reroute — together with a provider-accounting reconciliation model, privacy-preserving telemetry, and a security model covering denial-of-wallet, tool-loop containment, and refusal handling. We argue the methodology grows in importance regardless of price direction, because agentic workloads multiply tokens-per-task faster than unit prices decline.

From research to your network.

The principles in these papers ship in the PacketViper platform today — inline, agentless, single-box. See how they apply to your environment.